Laboratory evaluation for the differential diagnosis of possible multiple sclerosis in the United States: A physician survey.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence and lack of guidelines for diagnostic laboratory evaluation of patients with possible multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To survey neurologists on their practice of laboratory testing in patients with possible MS. METHODS: An online survey was developed to query the frequency of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies ordered in the routine evaluation of patients with possible MS, and in three hypothetical clinical cases. Non-MS specialist neurologists who evaluate patients for MS in their practice were invited to participate by MedSurvey (a medical market research company). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 190 neurologists. A mean of 17.2 (SD: 17.0) tests in serum and CSF were reported "always" ordered in the evaluation of patients with possible MS. CSF oligoclonal bands was the most frequently selected ("always" among 73.7% of participants). Antinuclear antibody (43.2%), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (34.2%), and thyroid stimulating hormone (31.6%) were also among the most frequently ordered. DISCUSSION: Extensive laboratory evaluations are often completed in the evaluation of possible MS. However, many of these tests have poor specificity and false positive results could yield unnecessary increased costs, diagnostic delay, and potentially misdiagnosis. Further research is needed to identify optimal laboratory approaches for possible MS.

ADC restriction is not associated with clinical response to plasma exchange following a cerebral attack of multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: MS is the most common CNS inflammatory demyelinating disease. Plasma exchange (PLEX) has well-demonstrated efficacy in acute corticosteroid-refractory attacks of demyelination but identifying the factors that predict favorable PLEX response remains elusive. We aimed to determine if apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) restriction on brain MRI predicts clinical response to PLEX in individuals with an acute cerebral attack of MS. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of individuals with a cerebral attack of MS who underwent PLEX at Mayo Clinic. RESULTS: We identified 34 individuals who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven (79%) responded to plasma exchange, with 16/34 (47%) having moderate and 11/34 (32%) marked improvement. Twenty-three (68%) people had ADC restriction on brain MRI prior to PLEX.  ADC restriction did not predict response (p = 0.51). Several other pre-PLEX factors, including sex, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at initial attack, time to PLEX, and concurrent spinal cord attack, also failed to predict response. Plasma-exchange responders had less disability at 6-month follow-up compared to non-responders (median EDSS 2.5 (range 1.0-10.0) vs. 7.5 (5.5-10.0), p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Acute cerebral attacks of MS have a high rate of plasma exchange response resulting in a lower EDSS at 6-months. ADC restriction does not predict response to plasma exchange.

Pericardial Effusion as a Purported Manifestation of Graft-versus-Host Disease following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Large pericardial effusion (LPE) and tamponade are purported manifestations associated with atypical chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD); however, their temporal association with GVHD, management, and impact on overall outcome are not well established. We report a retrospective analysis of 38 patients who developed LPE from a cohort of 1265 (3.00%) patients age ≥18 years who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) at Mayo Clinic between March 1993 and August 2020. The median patient age at the time of LPE was 54 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44 to 58 years), and 8 of the 38 patients (21%) had previous cardiomyopathy. The median time from alloHCT to detection of LPE was 197 days (IQR, 40 to 378 days). Overall, the incidence of grade II (15 of 38; 40%) and grade III-IV (9 of 38; 24%) acute GVHD (aGVHD) was higher in patients who developed LPE compared with those who did not develop LPE (P = .005). The incidence rates of moderate (10 of 38; 26%) and severe (15 of 38; 40%) cGVHD according to the 2014 National Institutes of Health cGVHD criteria were also higher in the LPE cohort (P = .03). Twenty-nine patients (76%) presented with cardiac tamponade, 32 patients (84%) underwent urgent pericardiocentesis for symptomatic LPE, and 2 patients had a pericardial window placement. Four patients were medically managed with colchicine, steroids, diuresis, and immunosuppressive therapy (IST). On multivariable analysis, HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) group (hazard ratio [HR] 3.57; [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29 to 9.85; P = .014] for HCT-CI 1 to 2; 4.06 [95% CI, 1.50 to 10.99; P = .006] for HCT-CI ≥3) and aGVHD (HR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.11 to 5.12; P = .026] for grade II and 2.82 [95% CI, 1.07 to 7.44; P = .038] for grade III-IV) were significant risk factors for developing LPE. At a median follow-up of 40 months post-alloHCT, median disease-free survival (DFS) was 34.2 months (95% CI, 25.3 to 45.7 months) in patients who did not develop LPE and 32.2 months (95% CI, 13.2 to undefined upper limit) in those who developed LPE (P = .41). The median overall survival (OS) post-alloHCT was 50.9 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 64.8 months) in patients who did not develop LPE and was 32.9 months (95% CI, 19.5 to undefined upper limit) in patients who developed LPE (P = .003). In summary, LPE and tamponade can present at various time points post-alloHCT, and management includes pericardiocentesis, steroids, and intensification/initiation of IST if associated with serositis. LPE does not appear to result in permanent cardiac damage but results in inferior OS.